The problem
with violence in all aspects of people’s lives has never taken so devastating
measures as we witness today. Children are faced with aggression on the
streets, in their homes, and in the cartoons they watch. This learnt behavior
has become an integral part of their lives, but its motives and manifestations
at schools often seem inconceivable. Despite the prevailing presence of brutal
behavior among children, the problem of violence and bullying is not nearly
elaborated as well as it should be.
Educators
and schools fail to commit to substantial examination of the causes, effects,
and possible solutions of this problem. The violence expressed by individuals
at school is only a representation of the systematic confusion, assaults, and
distorted values children are being subjected to. The solutions include
edifying measures that will result from comprehensive analysis of the root of
the problems and individualistic approach towards the troubled students.
During the
last two decades, psychologists have been focused on the relation between the
school environment and the signs of violence between students. However, the
inability to validate school climate with empirical measures resulted with
complex findings that are hard to comprehend. The power of a person over other
individuals is not entirely measureable due to the diversity of the reasons for
his actions, as well as the means used in different situations.
Slavoj
Žižek, a respected philosopher and cultural critic, examines the ways people
perceive and misperceive violence in his book Violence: Six Sideways
Reflections. He states that terrorists, murderers, warriors, and other actors
of “subjective” violence present the tip of the iceberg made up of “symbolic”
violence, which is embodied in language, and “systematic” violence, which is
the most dangerous form related to the disastrous consequences of the economic
and political system. Žižek’s theory of symbolic and systematic violence can be
translated into the school environment.
The reasons
for these subtle forms of violent behavior cannot be discovered without a
psychoanalytic approach, aimed at revealing the deepest roots that are located
in the conscious and subconscious levels of the students. The first and
foremost obstacle in identifying the reasons for violent behavior on individual
basis is the fact that violence is an objective characteristic of the society.
This behavior, as part of all cultures, refers to threat or use of force with
the purpose to prevent certain events, or to cause harm for mere pleasure. The
government’s institutions use violence to punish or prevent criminal behavior.
Since war and violence have been celebrated throughout the centuries, the
reasons for violent behavior in schools should be extended beyond the family,
social, and classroom environment the children are subjected to.
The studies
conducted by psychologists are very complex, but young people can give us a
more specific vision of the origins of these problems, as well as possible ways
to solve them in future. Most educators and schools adopt the attitude of “zero
tolerance” but don’t bother to look at the big picture and discover the true
reasons for violent behavior. In most cases, children’s aggression results from
the occurrences in their homes, but the number of students from functional
families who also show signs of violence is not to be neglected.
Along the
struggle for success, people are always faced with confrontations that
determine their commitment and will to achieve the goals. In the jungle of
society, only the strong ones succeed. Although people have their individual
features, they are not different from the order they come from. Just as the
state subjugates its citizens by laws, the citizens find their own subjects to
rule. The only way to incorporate positive values in young students’ moral
concepts is to create an environment that is not associated with any
discrimination and preference. Only coordinated cooperation between schools,
educators, parents and children will result with control over the violent
behavior among students.
The rules
imposed by teachers should be instructive, positively set, and brief. Instead
of forbidding certain ways of behavior, the rules should be aimed at guiding
students how to react in certain situations. Constructive behavior should
always be supported through eye contact and friendly attitude. When
disciplinary measures are applied, they should be instructive instead of
punitive. Teachers should make sure that those measures are focused on the
improper behavior of the student, not the student himself. The consequences of
verbal and physical aggression between students can be balanced out with team
activities that are not limited to the classroom.
School
violence is not a problem that should be solely treated on individual bases
with the application of discipline measures. It is a social and historical
issue whose effects shape children’s development from early age. It is easy to
say that we all want to live in a world without violence, but no philosopher,
psychologist or politician has offered reasonable and applicable solutions
against the problem on “micro” level. Although society has always been tied to
different forms of violent behavior, it is not unreasonable for educators to
make attempts towards a classroom without aggression and bullying.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar